November 12, 1999 Volume 7, Number 6


GENERAL
INFORMATION:

About OCN


IN THIS PUBLICATION:
Cover
Stories

Other
News

Archives

Around
the Bowl

Campus
On-line

Coming
Events

Graduate
Students

Miscellany

Notes
from HRD

Viewpoint

Profile

Research

MacKinnon takes issue with Maclean’s rankings


While acknowledging it’s "a concern" and he’d like the U of S to score better, Pres. Peter MacKinnon says he won’t let the annual Maclean’s ranking of Canada’s universities steer actions at the University.

In comments to reporters Nov. 8, the day after release of the Maclean’s results, MacKinnon said the values of the magazine’s survey don’t fit the values of the U of S, which partly explains why this University places low each year.

This year, for the second year in a row, the U of S slipped one place in the overall rankings in its category of "medical/doctoral" universities. It fell to 14th out of 15 medical/doctoral universities. Last year it fell to 13th place, from 12th in 1997.

MacKinnon said Maclean’s doesn’t measure a number of criteria on which the U of S would score well, like low tuition fees and accessibility for Saskatchewan residents – and its measures of things like reputation and alumni support are skewed against the U of S.

"The U of S is, in effect, punished by Maclean’s for low tuition fees ...(and) the rankings do not take into account the special mandates of universities like the U of S, whose first commitment is to serve the people of this province.

"I don’t think we can chart our course by the Maclean’s survey," MacKinnon told half a dozen reporters in a telephone news conference conducted from Swift Current, where he was on the second leg of a tour to various parts of the province.

In fact, MacKinnon said that in spite of scoring low on the "reputation" question, "I happen to know, by many personal contacts, that the U of S is a highly-respected university. All our programs are fully subscribed this year, and our enrolment is up."

He said the University is taking measures to stress high quality in a number of areas – like the recently instituted systematic program review of all areas of the U of S, and a renewed emphasis on gaining a larger share of national research funding.

"I would be very surprised if our plans and our progress don’t register in the Maclean’s survey in the near future," MacKinnon told reporters.

He said it must be recognized that these rankings are among universities which are all of comparable good quality, not between very good and very bad institutions.

MacKinnon said Maclean’s measures alumni contributions by the number contributing, not by overall contributions – so, "if we had asked each alumni to contribute $1, we would have come in first" in that category. Yet, he said, the U of S focuses its fundraising efforts on alumni in a position to contribute, and as a result raises $800,000 per year.

And he said he has "no doubt whatsoever" that the reputational survey of high school guidance counsellors, university officials and others concentrates on those "largely located in Ontario, B.C. and highly populated centres" – so the universities in those places do well.

MacKinnon did say the U of S needs to do better on some of the factors mentioned in the Maclean’s survey.

"Sure it’s a concern ... We have to see our success in national research council awards increase.

"Our beginning salaries (for faculty) have to be improved.

"(And) we want to put in place more scholarships."

But the bottom line, MacKinnon said, is that "students are getting a very good quality of education at the University of Saskatchewan."

In the medical/doctoral category, universities ranked, from first to 15th: Toronto, UBC & Queen’s (tied for second), McGill, Western, McMaster, Alberta, Dalhousie, Montreal, Calgary, Laval, Ottawa, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Sherbrooke.

Maclean’s found overall:

  • Full-time faculty at universities decreased by 8%.

  • First-year classes taught by tenured faculty was down by 7%.

  • Portion of operating budget spent on scholarships and bursaries was up by 63%.

  • Tuition was up 36%.

In the "Primarily Undergraduate" category of universities, Acadia came first.

In the "Comprehensive" category, Waterloo came first.

The Maclean’s criteria include incoming student grades, % of students from out-of-province, graduation rates, class sizes, % of faculty with PhDs, number of faculty getting research grants, money spent on student services, operating budget per student, library volumes per student, and reputation.


See related story, Viewpoint: Maclean's values aren't those of U of S.



News Index

Next Article



On Campus News is published by the Office of Communications, University of Saskatchewan.
For further information, visit the web site or contact communications@usask.ca




Next issue of 
On Campus
News:
Friday,
 November 26

Advertising
and copy
deadline:
Friday,
 November 19