![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Research ColumnU of S triples its CIHR funding, getting $5.5m
Judging from our recent performance with federal health grants, health research at U of S appears to be a patient on the mend. In the latest Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) competition, U of S has doubled its applications, doubled its success rate and more than tripled its total funding. Our researchers garnered a total of more than $5.5 million for 12 research projects that could pave the way for new vaccines and shed new light on health problems as diverse as asthma, cancer, epilepsy, heart attack, and high blood pressure. This new-found success spurred Saskatchewan Post-Secondary Education Minister Pat Lorjé to tell the Star-Phoenix she believes there’s “a rejuvenation taking place at the U of S and that’s because a lot of people have worked hard to turn things around.” Eleven of 42 proposals for operating grants were approved — a 26-per-cent success rate. That’s double the U of S success rate in the last two competitions. As well, $1.8 million was awarded under the CIHR Health Research Program of Excellence to VIDO Director Lorne Babiuk and his 10-member cross-Canada team to develop a family of needle-free vaccines that will potentially protect young animals and children from infectious organisms. In all likelihood, the next round of awards under the Saskatchewan-CIHR Regional Partnership Program, which will be announced soon, will increase U of S health research awards to a level that will equal or exceed the national average of 30 per cent. There’s also evidence U of S is expanding its health research beyond bio-medical science. Sociologist Harley Dickinson will receive $350,000 for his part in a $1.9-million U of A-led project into knowledge utilization and policy implementation in health care. And last month, CIHR announced it will provide $3 million for an Indigenous Peoples Health Research Centre to be located on both university campuses. What accounts for the apparent turnaround in our health funding fortunes? In part, it may be the internal grant review process which has brought a measure of quality control to the application process. “This may be the first good evidence of the effect of that initiative,” said Michael Corcoran, Vice-President of Research. “We know this works in other places. We may need to even toughen up this process because we don’t want this success to be an isolated spike. We want this to be sustained.” Corcoran also detects a renewed sense of optimism about the research climate on campus which he attributes to the leadership of President Peter MacKinnon in encouraging research. “People who may not have applied before may be seeing things turn around,” he said. There’ve also been instances where researchers who’d been previously turned down by CIHR were successful in this round because they modified their proposals and applied again. “It may be that people were reluctant to do that in the past,” he said. Corcoran is himself a case in point. His proposal for more than $350,000 to assess the anti-epileptic effects of a new generation of cannabis-like compounds was approved this round — his third attempt. Of course, success in one competition does not constitute a trend. The real test of whether a corner has been turned will be the next few rounds of competition. What is certain is that the new money will generate more jobs for research associates, post-doctoral fellows, technicians and graduate students, helping to build a critical mass of research expertise. And the new research will bring new insights and cutting-edge knowledge to the classroom experience for students. Other approved projects include:
| ||||||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||||||